This man reportedly ran the historic Whitey Bulger trial, and no video from that time period either. Heres How (and When) To Watch President Trump At CPAC! That was detailed in yet another Durham court filing last week, in the Virginia federal court where Danchenko is soon scheduled to be tried. As a subscriber, you have 10 gift articles to give each month. For perhaps everyone but Sussmann himself, the verdict at his trial may be beside the point. Reply HELP for help, STOP to end. .hustle-ui.hustle_module_id_1[data-id="1"] .hustle-layout .hustle-button-cta {width:100%!important;font-size:18px!important;}.hustle-ui.module_id_1 .hustle-popup-content {max-width: 400px!important;}.hustle-group-content p {font-size:18px!important;margin: 24px 0 0!important;}.hustle-content-wrap{padding-bottom:0!important;}, We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. So what happened? The Alfa Bank issue traces back to the spring of 2016, when it came to light that Russia had hacked Democrats. And second, it was to get law enforcement to investigate it; and perhaps third, your honor, to get the press to report on the fact that law enforcement was investigating it.. Because no one You been drinking brew for breakfast Problem is that it had so many holes an d exceptions that it has not really led to more taping at all. Three years later, the team led by the special counsel, John H. Durham, on Monday will open the first trial in a case their investigation developed, bringing before a jury the claims and counterclaims that surrounded the 2016 presidential campaign. And kinda boring. What you start to find are just a bunch of videos of a still picture of him and a voiceover playing. Durhams prosecutors presented abundant evidence that Sussmann had falsely told the FBI that he was not working for the Clinton campaign when he peddled spurious information about a supposed Trump-Putin communications back channel. 600.8(a)(1). Warren T. Bamford, special agent in charge of the FBI's Boston office. Foreign leaders do not have the right to unilaterally disclose U.S. classified information that has been shared with their country pursuant to a bilateral agreement. Rudie cant fail (no, no) The defense has also subpoenaed Mr. Lichtblau, who is no longer at The Times, to testify. But the judge barred Mr. Durham from presenting evidence or arguments along those lines, saying that unless there was proof Mr. Sussmann had reason to doubt the data when it was brought to him, there should not be a time-consuming and largely unnecessary mini-trial to determine the existence and scope of an uncharged conspiracy.. A lawyer for Mr. Lichtblau has asked the judge to limit questioning to his discussions with Mr. Sussmann, avoiding other confidential sources and journalistic matters. David X. Sullivan, a longtime federal prosecutor who's now running for Congress, joined the U.S. attorney's office in New Haven in 1989 and worked alongside Durham for years. IE 11 is not supported. Click into each one of those videos that shows up and you will find the same thing in each one. knew of the political connection, agents might have treated the matter differently. John Durham speaks to reporters on the steps of U.S. District Court in New Haven, Connecticut. is something that was inconsistent with what they would have wanted before there was any press, Mr. Berkowitz said. In fact, many of them seem to have spent recent weeks positioning themselves for the possibility of an acquittal. Im happy to be proven wrong, Im not saying this is some huge, massive conspiracyunless it is? (His report detailed numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump campaign, but he did not charge any Trump associate with a criminal conspiracy with Russia. In the original indictment, the FBI was presented as the victim of a crime, not the Trump campaign. (VIDEO) Donald Trump Pitches Agenda 47: Create Freedom Cities. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop. Notes of a March 2017 F.B.I. This is not a video of him speaking, its a still image of him with audio over the top: So it this one, still image with audio over the top: AND PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE READ THIS: dont send me this one either. Trump and his allies said the disclosure was proof that Trump was under surveillance while he was in office. The document production comes in the March 2022 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch after the DOJ failed to respond to an August 2021, request for records of communication between Special Counsel John Durham and Attorney General Merrick Garland, and all budget records related to the operations of the office of Special Counsel (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice(No. ht[BREAK]tps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEK9oK02D1M. When the bureau finally got around to questioning Danchenko because it hadnt been able to corroborate Steeles claims despite relying on them in court it learned that Steele appeared to have exaggerated and possibly fabricated rumors and innuendo about Trump that Danchenko was said to have passed along. In fact, most photos you see are designed to make you think hes talking and giving press conferences. https://www.emptywheel.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Screen-Shot-2017-09-21-at-8.46.52-AM.png, https://www.emptywheel.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Logo-Web.png, John Durham and the First Fight over a Doctored MemCon of Trumps Meetings with Russia. The annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) made one thing especially clear this week: This is former President Trump's convention. But the prosecutors curiously portrayed the FBI as the victim of Sussmanns machinations when the proof suggested that the bureau was not fooled at all and seemed more like a willing participant in building the Trump/Russia political narrative. "You know, I'm not the only person working on this case. Something potentially much more interesting. Durhams investigation indicates that Danchenko lied to the FBI multiple times, falsehoods that should have been easy for the nations flagship federal investigative agency to run down. Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law. Andrew C. McCarthy is a former federal prosecutor. Working with Rodney Joffe, a technology executive and cybersecurity expert, they theorized that it might be a covert communications channel. A deep dive into Bill Barr and U.S. Attorney John Durham's investigation and the costs entailed. "), (Read "The U.S. Prison for Iraq's Worst. tried to ask The Times to slow down on publishing. Editor's note: This story has been updated with additional details throughout. Read our full Disclosure. The team argued that he lied because if the F.B.I. . Thus, pursuant to International law, he was obligated to protect it which he clearly failed to do. But he suggested that the defense would contend that Mr. Sussmann did not believe he was taking the matter to the F.B.I. foundations, and corporations and are tax-deductible to the extent allowed by law. meeting with Mr. Baker show that the bureau understood he had one by then. Judge Christopher Cooper of the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia, an Obama appointee, has imposed some limits on what Mr. Durhams team may present to the jury. Intubation in town (ah-ah-ah), Rudy I continue to find that extremely strange! And please, if you do nothing else, read this.. I actually think this is a major story just waiting to blow up. Best done in very small increments! 1:22-cv-00734)). Now I want to talk about something else. Last week, in a jaw-dropping court submission, Durham revealed that the FBI signed up Danchenko as an informant and paid him for almost three years from March 2017 through October 2020 . Please share your thoughts about this article below. He just posted a new video today apparently responding to my articles covering the question of whether John Durham actually exists. Attached is the John Durham Special Counsel Office Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 budget plan. Analysis by Chris . There do exist photos of the man, but the same 4-5 photos is all you will ever find. Attorney General William Barr said there will be a "development" in U.S. Attorney John Durham's criminal inquiry into the Russia . The press-shy Connecticut prosecutor was tapped by Attorney General Eric Holder on Aug. 24 to investigate alleged mistreatment of terror suspects by CIA interrogators and contractors. As you probably recall, they did supposedly instigate a new policy the Obama years as to taping. Within the U.S., we have elected to utilize the classification system to protect such shared information. When you type in the name of a website like Google.com, Graham said, DNS will translate it to a specific IP address and a specific group of servers. ABOUT | CONTACT | SUPPORT | COMMENT POLICY | PRIVACY POLICY | LOGIN. Last week, in a jaw-dropping court submission, Durham revealed that the FBI signed up Danchenko as an informant and paid him for almost three years from March 2017 through October 2020. The big picture: So far, the only criminal conviction produced by Durham's investigation was against a low-level former FBI lawyer, who was sentenced to 12 months' probation after pleading guilty to altering an email used to obtain a surveillance warrant on Trump campaign aide Carter Page. | The judge ruled, for instance, that Durhams team cannot suggest to the jury that the data provided to the FBI by Sussmann had been improperly obtained or used by Joffe, since prosecutors had failed to provide sufficient evidence showing that Mr. Sussmann had concerns that the data was obtained inappropriately, or that he had any independent knowledge about the data collection beyond whatever he may have learned from Mr. Joffe through privileged communications., Even more significantly, the judge curtailed Durhams ability to present evidence on the question that seems to have been driving the case from the start in particular, whether, as Durham claimed in court filings, there was a wide-ranging conspiracy comprised of officials from the Clinton campaign, the campaigns lawyers, Joffe, Fusion GPS and an assortment of IT professionals to prevent Trumps election by assembling and disseminating the [Alfa Bank] allegations and other derogatory information about Trump to the media and the U.S. government., The court concluded that while Durhams team had proffered some evidence of a collective effort to disseminate the purported link between Trump and Alfa Bank to the press and others, the contours of this venture and its participants are not entirely obvious. The judge went on to observe that it was far from clear that the researchers who were not employed by Mr. Joffe, Fusion GPS, or the Clinton Campaign, and most of whom never communicated with Mr. Sussmann shared in this common goal, and, as a result, ultimately held that Durham had failed to justify what would essentially amount to a second trial on a non-crime.. Durham is a longtime federal prosecutor in Connecticut known for leading organized crime and public corruption cases. Technology has improved so much that tiny recording devices can hold hundreds of hours of audio and periodic camera shots for hours. . John Durham, appointed by then-Attorney General William Barr in 2020 to probe the origins of the FBIs investigation of Russian election interference, said Tech Executive-1, not named in the filing but first identified by The New York Times as Rodney Joffe, used his access to domain name system, or DNS, data to compile information about which computers and servers the White House servers were communicating with. No, Im talking about why a man with such a storied and PUBLIC career does not have a single video existing of him anywhere online. Brian R. Maroney, 64, of Silver Creek, NY formerly of Durham, CT passed away unexpectedly on Saturday morning, February 25, 2023 at his home. In the eight months since Sussmanns indictment, the case has traveled an unusual path even by the standards of politically high-profile prosecutions. The result is particularly ironic since many of these same people vocally criticized the coverage of the Mueller investigation on the theory that the media was cherry-picking information and credulously accepting the claims of prosecutors and sympathetic pundits, but they have adopted the same methodology that they once railed against a combination of pseudo-forensic readings of court filings and public documents, politically provocative narratives constructed from largely contextless scraps of information, and a strong, seemingly indestructible confirmation bias against their political adversaries. Is this all John Durham has? PLEASE DO NOT SEND ME A LINK TO GOOGLE SEARCH RESULTS OR BING VIDEO SEARCH RESULTS SEARCHING FOR JOHN DURHAM. Did Steven DAntuono Make It Easier for Trump to Steal 47 Classified Documents? ET):A previous version of this article incorrectly specified a time period in special counsel Durhams Feb. 11 filing when internet data from the White House was collected. For now, we have to hope that Durhams final report will answer that question. | Michael Sussmann, a lawyer whose firm represented the Hillary Clinton campaign in 2016, was acquitted of a felony charge of lying to the FBI on Tuesday. Could Durham run into the same problem in prosecuting Danchenko? [Side comment: I bet theyd love to Cancel that guy right about now, huh? was aware that he had represented Democrats on matters related to Russias hacking of their servers, and subsequent communications made clear that he also had a client who had played a role in developing the data analysis concerning Alfa Bank, his lawyers say. In the filing Friday, prosecutors said Tech Executive-1 gave Sussmann data about communications between computer servers at the EOP, two Trump-owned buildings in New York and an unrelated medical firm with Russian-made cellphones near the White House. Mr. Baker is expected to be a primary prosecution witness. SICK: Here Is That Perverted Sex Ed Video Teaching First Graders To Masturbate, Pfizer Makes Stunning Admission On COVID-19 Jab Clinical Trials. Ive been covering a REALLY weird story about John Durham recently. In September, Durhams team indicted Sussmann, and in November, they charged a researcher named Igor Danchenko with lying to the FBI about his work on the infamous Steele dossier, in a case that will go to trial in October. official that he was not acting on behalf of any client. Zelensky Exposed (Literally): This Is The Guy We Are Sending Billions To? West Coast Conference Men's Basketball Tournament. The only people who seem to be following the story are YouTube prankers. At the time of the indictment,Sussmannsattorneys issued a statement that said: MichaelSussmannwas indicted today because of politics, not facts. "I'm not at CPAC. in part on behalf of the Clinton campaign. Legal experts said Sussmann could face additional legal exposure if he failed to disclose his relationship to Joffe. John Durham is a low-profile professional thrust into a decidedly high-profile assignment. What they're saying: "While we are disappointed in the outcome, we respect the jury's decision and thank them for their service," Durham said in a statement. Zelensky Exposed (Literally): This Is The Guy We Are Sending Billions To? Within days, Durhams team filed a non-apology apology with the court in which they tried to distance themselves from third parties or members of the media that have overstated, understated, or otherwise misinterpreted facts alleged in the offices filings. After all, Danchenko, like Sussmann, is charged with lying to the FBI, and a jury may once again be left to wonder whether the bureau was actually fooled. Hey, its Noah and I want to make sure were connected on Twitter. In 1999 he was selected by Attorney General Janet Reno to probe law-enforcement corruption in Boston. At the request of then-Attorney General Reno, investigated whether notorious Boston mobsters James "Whitey" Bulger and Stephen "The Rifleman" Flemmi had corrupted the FBI agents whom they served as informants. His grand jury wrapped up work last week, apparently with no new indictments on the horizon. White Students Forced to Pledge Allegiance to BLM, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Its safe again and were having a lot of fun over there. Easy enough to edit and remove those no longer needed. The F.B.I. No, not the fact that he resigned. But hes supposed to be the smartest and the best, and he works for Bill Barr, who is a great attorney general. convene a press conference a mere 12 days before the November 7th presidential election to announce that "peace is at hand" in Vietnam. The defense argues that Mr. Sussmann was not acting on their behalf at the meeting. Id love to see it, just so I can prove the man actually exists. (Boston Globe, January 7, 2008), "He's such a decent guy you can't hate him. NATIONAL POLL: Do You Believe John Durham Exists And Is A Real Person? Married with four sons, one of whom is a federal prosecutor in Brooklyn, N.Y. Described by the Hartford Courant as frequently appearing "impatient, distracted and privately amused" in court. As youre looking for videos, dont both sending me this one below. Just abysmal. A photo of a segment from a February episode of Fox and Friends on a computer screen. I'm at TPAC," said John Fredericks, a conservative radio show host who served as the chairman in Virginia for Trump's 2016 and 2020 campaigns. Ill keep watching the comments below and see if anyone can find a video. The other two had died in prison. Judicial Watch is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. 2023 NYP Holdings, Inc. All Rights Reserved, Medias lab-leak oops, WHs gaslighting on energy and more, GOPers stand up for life and against AG Merrick Garland, Over a dozen sources had Hunter Biden tips: Sen. Chuck Grassley grills AG, China slams COVID lab-leak theory, accuses FBI of politicizing issue, acquitted Democratic lawyer Michael Sussmann. Durhams team, however, has so far failed to persuade anyone to serve as this kind of witness. Bob Child/Associated Press At the same hearing, a defense. By JOSH GERSTEIN. After that, today comes this video from yet another YouTube channel that basically just ripped off Eric D. Kirks video and made it more crappy: Read the comments, so many people are thinking this is surely Durham: A reader sent me this report, which I have NOT been able to independently verify. Durham loses again in court, but trial airs FBI flaws. The FBI, for some reason, is at least 15 years behind, technologically speaking. ), But supporters of Mr. Trump have rallied around Mr. Durhams narrative, which resonates with Mr. Trumps oft-repeated claim that the entire Russia investigation was a hoax.. "I also want to recognize and thank the investigators and the prosecution team for their dedicated efforts in seeking truth and justice in this case," he added. Under international law, this bilateral executive agreement obligated the U.S. to protect the information. individuals, Yesterday, the Eric D. Kirk channel posted this parody (you can ready my thoughts on it above): And yet despite me telling you in the article that it was fake, so many of you keep emailing me saying here it is! That we had to file a federal lawsuit to get basic budget information about this historic investigation speaks volumes. Well, Erik D. Kirk must read WeLoveTrump or someone is forwarding him my articles because he has picked up on the story Ive been covering and realized hes getting some fame! Attached is the John Durham Special Counsel Office Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 budget plan. on behalf of the campaign or Mr. Joffe. According to the DOJ press release, Durham recommended that a full criminal investigation be . And that the Garland DOJ is still hiding documents adds to the scandal.. F ired FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok, who played a key role in initiating and leading the bureau's investigation into allegations of Trump-Russia collusion, said he has not been interviewed by . We invite you to become a WeLoveTrump insider. To support the emptywheel site, choose the option below that works best for you. Not a video of him holding a press conference, or even some b-roll of him walking into a courthouse.nothing! According to prosecutors, Sussmann did not disclose to the agency, identified by the Times as the CIA, that he was working for a client when he provided the report, when he was actually representing Tech Executive-1, aka Joffe. Durhams investigation continues and has resulted in one other indictment besides Sussmanns. Judicial Watch challenged the withheld information, and the DOJ now has re-released the documents without the redactions. Ankush Khardori, an attorney and former federal prosecutor, is a Politico Magazine contributing editor. The Trump-era special prosecutor begins his first trial this week, but the verdict hardly matters. At the same hearing, a defense lawyer, Sean Berkowitz, said that he would not contest that Mr. Sussmann represented the Clinton campaign in telling reporters about those allegations. Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, at a news conference in Washington, D.C., on July 21. His appointment came on the heels of a newly released Justice Department report indicating interrogators abused prisoners by, among other things, threatening to kill one man's family and choking another man to the point of unconsciousness. Although the Special Counsel implies that in Mr. Sussmanns February 9, 2017 meeting, he provided Agency-2 with EOP data from after Mr. Trump took office, said the attorney, the Special Counsel is well aware that the data provided to Agency-2 pertained only to the period of time before Mr. Trump took office, when Barack Obama was President.. Im not talking about videos about a certain topic or recent videos or videos of his personal life. JUST IN - John Durham to resign from the U.S. Attorney's Office effective at midnight on February 28. No, Im saying not one single video of the man exists online! Instead, it has become increasingly clear that the proceeding is unlikely to offer any sort of definitive resolution to the most politically consequential questions at issue. But he's supposed to be the smartest and the best, and he works for Bill Barr, who is a great attorney general. Special counsel says tech executive used White House computers to look for dirt on Trump, a special counsel appointed during the Trump administration, Accounting firm cuts ties with Trump Organization, retracts financial statements, House committee calls on Rep. Jim Jordan to provide information about Jan. 6 Capitol riot. AP Photo/Jon Elswick, The trial beginning this week was supposed to be the culmination of an otherwise spotty and languorous investigation, now entering its fourth year. John Durham was appointed special counsel in 2019 to investigate the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation in the wake of the Mueller report. According to prosecutors, during a Sept. 19,2016,meeting betweenSussmannand the FBIs general counsel at the time, James Baker, Sussmann told Baker about suspicions relating to alleged secret communications between the Trump campaign and Russia. At its core, the Special Counsel is bringing a false statement charge based on an oral statement allegedly made five years ago to a single witness that is unrecorded and unobserved by anyone else. The FY 2022 budget estimate is $4,463,525 which, after Office of Management and Budget technical adjustments for the mandatory sequester, totals $4,209,104 in available operational funds. We would maybe have ended this thing a lot sooner had he been there originally. Dr. Faucis "SHADY" Gain of Function Research! On Thursday, January 20, 2021, in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion! August 13, 2020 09:36 PM. 2019 TIME USA, LLC. Responding to a reporter's inquiry about the Boston mafia probe. Beginning Monday morning in Washington, special counsel John Durham the prosecutor who was appointed in 2019 by Attorney General William Barr to investigate the origins of the Trump-Russia. White House spokeswoman on Monday referred all questions about Special Counsel John Durham's investigation to the Department of Justice . Still, the judge has given prosecutors broader latitude to call witnesses associated with the Clinton campaign, including Mr. Elias and Robby Mook, the campaign manager. 23d. Special counsel John Durham, the U.S. attorney appointed to investigate the origins of the Russia collusion and election interference probe, abruptly announced Friday that he would resign from the U.S. Attorney's office. Watch it till the end before you send it to me.its from a Saturday Night Live skit: Well, some of you have sent me some really interesting ideas! (Despite much hype, Durhams prosecutors were eventually forced to concede that there was no indication that the lawyers misrepresentation actually affected the investigation, while the sentencing judge said that the lawyer was simply saving himself some work rather than trying to mislead the presiding surveillance court.). The Trump forces, [] Durham was appointed to serve as Special Counsel for the Department of Justice on October 19, 2020: The Special Counsel is authorized to investigate whether any federal official, employee, or any other person or entity violated the law in connection with the intelligence, counter-intelligence, or law-enforcement activities directed at the 2016 presidential campaigns, individuals associated with those campaigns, and individuals associated with the administration of President Donald J. Trump, including but not limited to Crossfire Hurricane and the investigation of Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller, Ill. Although Danchenko was the most important source for Steeles explosive allegations against Trump, the FBI did not interview him prior to using Steeles dossier in its first two sworn surveillance applications, in October 2016 and January 2017. That probe led to the conviction of retired FBI agent John Connolly Jr., sentenced to 10 years in prison for helping the two avoid prosecution. Durhams conspiracy theory and I do not mean to use that term pejoratively, but that is what it is and will remain will not be tested in court anytime soon, but the notion is likely to live on among conservatives regardless. We remember you Frank! Whatever the outcome of the trial, the possibility that political observers on the right will modify their preconceptions about Trumps supposed victimization or the purportedly nefarious scheming of Clinton operatives seems increasingly remote. Youll see news anchors talking about John Durham with a still image of his face up on the screen.but nothing else. The thread that connects them is that the evidence that Durhams team proffered over the course of pre-trial proceedings concerning an allegedly broad, amorphous joint undertaking among an ill-defined network of loosely affiliated individuals spread throughout multiple organizations and institutions was exceedingly thin, based on scattered bits and pieces of information.