Catholic Priest With Tattoos, Articles W

What the Bleep!?: Down the Rabbit Hole (2006) - IMDb We believe news can and should expand a sense of identity and possibility beyond narrow conventional expectations. What the #$*! It comes from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, and it's about the limitations of trying to measure the position and momentum of subatomic particles this only applies to sub-atomic particlesa rock doesn't need you to bump into it to exist. Happy Water Crystals Debunked as PseudoScience June 23rd, 2018 - Are Dr Masaru Emoto?s Fantastic Claims Actually Real Via is masaru emoto . Hope you dont mind me butting in, just thought you might like to see these facts which are so far undisputed about the film. Amit Goswami (PhD) in What the Bleep Do We Know?. Blending New Age mysticism and quantum physics, What The Bleep Do We Know?! "What the Bleep" begins in NOVA-like fashion: galaxies swirl and scientists--we aren't told who they are until the end--expound on quantum mechanics and the nature of the universe. What the bleep Do we know ( 1080p) According to an article in Fortean Times by David Hambling, the origins of this story likely involved the voyages of Captain James Cook, not Columbus, and an account related by Robert Hughes which said Cook's ships were "complex and unfamiliar as to defy the natives' understanding". "Your mind can't tell the difference between what it sees and what it remembers" Dr Joseph Dispenza (Chiropractor ) in What the Bleep Do We Know? The 2004 theatrical release was succeeded by a substantially changed, extended home media version in 2006. He has stated in several venues that his views were totally misrepresented in the film. We will write a custom Essay on Philosophy Meaning of Arntz's Movie "What the Bleep Do We Know" specifically for you. In 1958 nasa started mapping the ocean and exploring it. and of course the big guy himself, Ramtha. What the #$*! Do We Know!? (Film) - TV Tropes The minds boggle | Science | The Guardian We're also connected to the universe by gravity, and we're connected to the planets by gravity. Whether you're religious, spiritual, or none of the above, you can say one thing for this movie: it's an equal-opportunity offender. Quantum mechanics is a replacement for the phrase "anything goes." As the movie did, this book compels listeners to ask themselves Gre. We're always being told we don't use our brain to its full capacity. This is one reason physicists studying a subatomic particle create large numbers of them in particle accelerators. But how are ordinary mortals to judge its assertions about the nature of matter, mind, and the universe? Guess that could not have been done to easily in the Catholic church. In the film, during a discussion of the influence of experience on perception, Candace Pert notes a story, which she says she believes is true, of Native Americans being unable to see Columbus's ships because they were outside their experience. Dr Joao Migueijo is reader in theoretical physics at Imperial College, London.What the Bleep Do We Know!? D (k)ow!? But what quantum mechanics doesn't change about the universe is, if you want to change things, you still have to do something. In a corrupt, greed-fueled world, a powerful alchemist leads a Christ-like character and seven materialistic figures to the Holy Mountain,. It's recognized as pedagogical exaggeration. [3], Work was split between Toronto-based Mr. X Inc., Lost Boys Studios in Vancouver, and Atomic Visual Effects in Cape Town, South Africa. I think its a good idea for people to consider the example of Hagelin: hes completely delusional and has zero common sense, but able to function at a high level in the particle theory community. So when you hear about quantum mechanics and devices, you can say, "OK, that sounds reasonable." Amit Gotswami Many religions and spiritual paths--from Hinduism, with its concept of maya, to Christian Science--teach that appearance is illusion. John Haglin and published a study guide. extrapolates from quantum physics to answer life's big questions. Q: You do see that in some science-fiction shows for example, last season on "Fringe." If your mind is the "observer" that quantum physics talks about, you should be able to choose which of the many possible realities around you comes into existence you can create your own reality, and probably come off anti-anxiety medication to boot. But Hagelin's use of the term "achieved" for the drop in crime is a bit strong. And if you really want to be friendly, ask me about "The Case forPluto.". Professor Clive Greated wrote that "thinking on neurology and addiction are covered in some detail but, unfortunately, early references in the film to quantum physics are not followed through, leading to a confused message". What the #$*! Do We (K)now!? - Letterboxd He points out that Gallo et al anounced that AIDS is caused by HIV at a press conference, without there being a single paper published in a scientific journal substantiating this. Ramtha - JZ Knight - The Skeptic's Dictionary - Skepdic.com was heavily criticised for being "a documentary aimed at the totally gullible". First, such claims rely on "hidden variables" susceptible to influence, he says. Our mind has enormous potential, but we only use a small part of it for conscious thought, and we miss a lot of what's going on around us. ", Critics offered mixed reviews as seen on the film review website Rotten Tomatoes, where it scored a "Rotten" 34% score with an average score of 4.6/10, based on 77 reviews. Even skeptics concede that we humans can fall into destructive thought patterns and need to cleanse our vision of what's real. We're bombarded by many things every second of the day, and a result, we're not specially prepared quantum mechanical systems, nor can we exert weird quantum powers over other objects. I guess it's a sign that quantum physics is entering the mainstream A: Well, yeah, the point is that there have been these new-age desires for lots of things to make the world better: crystals, energy vortices. Even though there's lots of proof that the Moon landing happened, some people don't . Initially, the film was released in only two theaters: one in Yelm, Washington (the home of the producers, which is also the home of Ramtha), and the other the Bagdad Theater in Portland, Oregon, where it was filmed. Interspersed with the plot were interviews with various supposed scientists with something to say about quantum physics, consciousness, God, etc. What was new? "I begin the book with a quote from Feynman that says, 'Reality takes precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled,'" he told me. The experts start "proving" that humans create their own reality by getting too attached to certain brain chemicals. But this only applies to sub-atomic particles a rock doesn't need you to bump into it to exist. I'm always up for a good New Age flick, even one masquerading as a documentary. Perhaps that is why they couldnt see them. [18] A BBC reviewer described it as "a documentary aimed at the totally gullible". "What the Bleep Do We Know?" is a trendy new movie that combines the worst elements of a snooze-worthy PBS documentary, a "change your mind, change your life" self-help book, and a Bugs. kazakore (kazakore) January 14, 2010, 6:30pm #10 Science and engineering are important for our future, and anything that engages the public can only be a good thing." And in fact we can make weird quantum phenomena happen. A moderately low-budget independent film, it was promoted using viral marketing methods and opened in art-house theaters in the western United States, winning several independent film awards before being picked up by a major distributor and eventually grossing over $10 million. Real news, real hope. This is the person who teaches the brain science in RSE. The movie gives two examples of experiments which have shown the power of the mind affecting reality. A: Well, Roger Penrose has given lots of new-age crackpots ammunition by suggesting that at some fundamental scale, quantum mechanics might be relevant for consciousness. By 1984 he had moved to Maharishi University and started building up the physics department there. What the Bleep Do We Know?: Discovering the Endless - Amazon Remembering The Isheagu Massacre Of May 1968 - Politics - Nigeria "What the Bleep Do We Know," as it is referred to for convenience, is not a conventional documentary about quantum physics. Interspersed with the plot were interviews with various supposed scientists with something to say about quantum physics, consciousness, God, etc. improve functionality and performance. Everyone said that you have to see this movie! So I did. At some point I guess he updated it to string field theory and the version you provided a link for. last of a series of columns written for Scientific American, Why great minds can't grasp consciousness. But that doesn't mean that astrology is true. The host of the show said this was done because it was negative It's more like a collision in the editing room between talking heads, an impenetrable human parable and a hallucinogenic animated cartoon. is released on Friday. Publishers Weekly What the Bleep Do We Know!? Several books have been written about the film's remarkable grassroots marketing campaign, which led to its unprecedented success. This has led to accusations, both formal and informal, directed towards the film's proponents, of spamming online message boards and forums with many thinly veiled promotional posts. [4], Lacking the funding and resources of the typical Hollywood film, the filmmakers relied on "guerrilla marketing" first to get the film into theaters, and then to attract audiences. As the layers to her everyday experiences fall away insertions in the story with scientists, and philosophers and religious leaders . But when the ramblings about quantum physics start merging with fridge magnet philosophy, it's time for a little reality checking. 1. Seven Times Planet TV Studios Went Way Too Far: ReportWire.org info@planettvstudios.com nicholas@planettvstudios.com Eric@planettvstudios.com Julie@planettvstudios.com Website YouTube Channel Facebook Twitter Instagram Planet TV Studios LHTV LLC When they use the word 'observe', they actually mean 'interact with', not look at or think about.). My FIL is a ex-Air force Pilot. The question is, how far down the rabbit hole, do you wanna go? The plot follows the fictional story of a photographer, using documentary-style interviews and computer-animated graphics, as she encounters emotional and existential obstacles in her life and begins to consider the idea that individual and group consciousness can influence the material world. What The Bleep Do We Know DEBUNKED., page 2 What the Bleep Do We Know!? - Wikipedia That would be, very hard to quantify:). Hobbs further disputed the film's use of the ten percent of the brain myth. As long as a sub-atomic particle is interacting with another sub-atomic particle, they'll both exist regardless of where you are or what you're doing. We must shake off the "ugly, superstitious, backwater concept of God" we learned as children, chides JZ Knight--uh, Ramtha. "The protagonist, Amanda, played by Academy Award-Winning actress Marlee Matlin, finds herself in a fantastic Alice in Wonderland experience when her daily, uninspired life literally begins to unravel, revealing the uncertain world of the quantum field hidden behind what we consider to be our normal, waking reality. It's hard to say where Candace Pert got the low-down on what the Native American Indians did or didn't see when Columbus and the gang hit the horizon. Well, people are able to undergo various transformations. Bleep raises thought-provoking questions about science and its relationship to spirituality and metaphysics. What the Bleep Do We Know? | Not Even Wrong - Columbia University In the movie What the Bleep Do We Know?, physicists, biologists and the occasional chiropractor tell us how quantum physics and neuroscience support their views on consciousness. The flip side of that is that you can use quantum mechanics, again in specially prepared systems, to communicate in a way that will allow us to know when someone is eavesdropping. What the Bleep Do We Know!? The article states that the domestic gross exceeded $10 million, described as not bad for a low-budget documentary, and that the DVD release attained even more significant success with over a million units shipped in the first six months following its release in March 2005. It sounds reasonable, and familiar. Hobbs also discusses Hagelin's experiment with Transcendental Meditation and the Washington DC rate of violent crime, saying that "the number of murders actually went up". In the letter, the authors write: "the movie illustrates the uncertainty principle with a bouncing basketball being in several places at once. [PDF] What the Bleep Do We Know ? | Semantic Scholar Directors William Arntz, Betsy Chasse Starring Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie Genres Science Fiction, Comedy, Drama, Documentary, Fantasy, Special Interest Author, speaker, and award-winning Writer/Director/Producer Mark Vicente was part of the creative team behind the sleeper hit "What The Bleep Do We Know?!". Answer (1 of 6): Although not being as well educated in the area as Professor Wacker, I think it's overly simplistic to suggest the subjects raised in the movie to be either factual or "almost completely mumbo-jumbo". https://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2005/06/30/2839498.htm? Neither of them convincingly achieve this. As the Amanda plot zooms here and there, a host of dubious evidence is marshaled to convince us that life is all about mind over matter. The meditation may not have helped the victims of violent crime, but it did win Hagelin the 1994 Ig Nobel Peace Prize. Do we know" . Simon Singh called it pseudoscience and said the suggestion "that if observing water changes its molecular structure, and if we are 90% water, then by observing ourselves we can change at a fundamental level via the laws of quantum physics" was "ridiculous balderdash". 2. The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle argues that its impossible to track the momentum and position of a subatomic particle. For traditional Christians, God is God not because your brain is making him up, but because he is. Thus, if a scientist repeats an experiment with subatomic particles often enough, the results will closely match the probabilities quantum theory predicts. We With researchers and theoretical scientists leading the way, it takes the reader through the looking glass of quantum physics into a universe that is more bizarre and alive than ever imagined. Dr Emoto takes photos of crystals formed in freezing water. But to insist, as one on-screen interviewee does, that the material world around us is just one "possible movement of consciousness" undermines the possibility of any objective, external reality--something fundamental to many religions and to science. This movie agrees with the scientists as far as the existence of the so called empty space is concerned. Hambling says it is likely that both the Hughes account and the story told by Pert were exaggerations of the records left by Captain Cook and the botanist Joseph Banks. Moreover, assume that they want your money. What the #$*! Do We Know? movie review (2004) | Roger Ebert To accomplish that, you would have to invoke "new physics," Dr. Schumm says, in which the explanation can be verified or falsified through experiment. [an error occurred while processing this directive]. subscription. Ive not seen the movie, and dont intend to, but David Alberts book on Quantum Mechanics and Experience is one of the best things Ive read on the interpretation of QM. What the Bleep Do We Know!? - WatchDocumentaries.com You dont have a Christian Science Monitor 5.Miceal Ledwith a clergyman with a rather dubious past (see http://unison.ie/irish_independent/stories.php3?ca=36&si=770458&issue_id=7565) is the one chosen by the film makers to be the theological spokesman. It was the biggest bunch of garbage that I had ever seen. Quantum mechanics is crazy, but it's just crazy enough to make the world still be sensible at a macroscopic level, the level that we experience. On the other hand, one finds 3+1, or more concretely inverse square law, to be mathematically peculiar when it refers to gravity, ie when mass is the source of the force. The movie "What the Bleep do we know" How much is true, or just "They take advantage of things we don't know very well or can't test very well, then use it in an unfair way," notes Andr de Gouva, a particle physicist at Northwestern University in Evanston, Ill. If he says hes being misrepresented, I quite believe him. Prominent if you go by citations that is. [1], In mid-2005, the filmmakers worked with HCI Books to expand on the film's themes in a book titled What the Bleep Do We Know! Bleep was conceived and its production funded by William Arntz, who co-directed the film along with Betsy Chasse and Mark Vicente; all three were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. ft. indoor riding arena once used for horse training which was refurbished and floored . What the Bleep Do We Know!? - Rotten Tomatoes